Showing posts with label Gender Equality. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gender Equality. Show all posts

Thursday, February 4, 2010

Women's Unemployment, Economic Insecurity, and Poverty at Historic Highs in the Recession

New IWPR Briefing Paper Finds Women's Unemployment, Economic Insecurity,
and Poverty at Historic Highs in the Recession
The Institute for Women's Policy Research released a comprehensive, 67-page
Briefing Paper, entitled Women and Men's Employment and Unemployment in
the Great Recession. Based on analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
and the Census Bureau, the Briefing Paper finds many families are relying on
women's earnings when men are unemployed and that unemployed men and
women are experiencing an average of 29 weeks of unemployment before finding
a new job.


The Briefing Paper, authored by Heidi Hartmann, Ph.D., Ashley English,
and Jeffrey Hayes, Ph.D., researchers at IWPR, is available on the


Big Gender Wage Gap Found After Federally Funded Training
A new Briefing Paper, The Workforce Investment Act and Women's Progress:
Does WIA Funded Training Reinforce Sex Segregation in the Labor Market
and the Gender Wage Gap?, released by the Institute for Women's Policy
Research, shows that federally funded training may reinforce sex segregation
and the gender wage gap.


The Workforce Investment Act (WIA) is likely to come up for reauthorization
this Congress. The Briefing Paper finds, based on data from the WIASRD
Data Book, that:

WIA includes 'self-sufficiency' as a stated objective of training services. Unless
greater attention is paid to the causes of the gender earnings gap after WIA
services, that goal will remain elusive for many women and their families.
Click here to view the Briefing Paper.


For Immediate Release Contact: Elisabeth Crum, (202)785-0186
New IWPR Briefing Paper Finds Women's Unemployment,
Economic Insecurity, and Poverty at Historic Highs in the
Recession

The Institute for Women's Policy Research released a comprehensive, 67-page
Briefing Paper, entitledWomen and Men's Employment and Unemployment in
the Great Recession. Based on analysis of data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics
and the Census Bureau, the Briefing Paper finds many families are relying on women's
earnings when men are unemployed and that unemployed men and women are
experiencing an average of 29 weeks of unemployment before finding a new job.

The Briefing Paper, authored by Heidi Hartmann, Ph.D., Ashley English, and
Jeffrey Hayes, Ph.D., researchers at IWPR, is available on the IWPR website here: www.iwpr.org/pdf/C373womeninrecession.pdf.

From the Executive Summary:

Since
December 2007, the U.S. economy has been in the worst recession since
the Great Depressionof the 1930s. Because much of the slowdown has occurred
in traditionally male fields such as manufacturing and construction, while a few
traditionally female fields such as health and education have shown job growth or
minimal job loss, many reports have focused on the job losses among men in the
labor force. At the same time the substantial job losses that have also occurred
among women in such sectors as retail, hospitality, and personal and business
services are rarely discussed. The number of unemployed women is now 6.3 million
(as of December 2009), an increase of 2.8 million unemployed women since the
recession began, a number larger than men's increased unemployment in most
previous recessions. Once they lose their jobs, women and men spend a similar
number of weeks unemployed; in December 2009, unemployed women and men
had been out of work for an astounding 29 weeks, on average. Moreover, a smaller
share of unemployed women collect unemployment insurance benefits compared
with unemployed men. Between December 2007 and November 2009, 36.8 percent
of unemployed women received unemployment benefits, on average, compared with
40.3 percent of unemployed men.
and disseminates its findings to address the needs of women, promote public dialogue,
and strengthen families, communities, and societies. IWPR's work is supported by
foundation grants, government grants and contracts, donations from individuals, and
contributions from organizations and corporations. IWPR is a 501 (c) (3) tax-exempt
organization that also works in affiliation with the women's studies and public policy
programs at The George Washington University.

Tuesday, February 2, 2010

Don't overstate women's progress




KANSAS CITY, Mo. — For several months now, we've been watching the percentage of women in the workplace creep toward the 50 percent mark.

The most recent numbers from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics' Current Employment Statistics survey show that 49.9 percent of establishment payroll jobs are held by women.

The Economist magazine this month looked to the tipping point and illustrated its cover with the iconic biceps-flexing woman from World War II, altering the poster's original headline — "We Can Do It!" — to "We Did It!"

But it depends on what the definition of "it" is.

"It" may be cause for shrugs ... for celebration ... or concern.

Before I explain, please permit an interesting historical aside: That "We Can Do It!" woman is not Rosie the Riveter.

Rather, the poster was based on a United Press International photograph of Geraldine Doyle, a factory employee. An artist, J. Howard Miller, used the photograph to paint the "We Can Do It!" poster for the Westinghouse Co. It was one of a series of patriotic posters that hung in-house at Westinghouse.

The "real" Rosie the Riveter image was painted by Norman Rockwell, who used a 19-year-old telephone operator in Vermont named Mary Doyle for his model for a 1943 Saturday Evening Post cover.

But back to the cautionary comment about crowing, "We Did It!"

First, saying that women are poised to hold half of all establishment payroll jobs is not the same as saying that women represent half of the work force.

They don't.

There still are about 10 million more men than women in the labor force.

It's true that this recession has been a "mancession." Layoffs hit industries and jobs dominated by men (construction and manufacturing) harder than those dominated by women (education and health care).

Even so, according to the labor bureau's Current Population Survey, there are about 7 million more employed men than women. That's because the population survey is a household survey. As such, it captures farm workers and other self-employed individuals who aren't included in the establishment payroll survey.

But even the household survey undercounts men; it excludes the military.

Whichever statistical series you put more weight on, it's obvious that women's presence in the workplace is a given — but far from a domination.

• Women, largely because they bear the children, still work less over their lifetimes than men.

• Women, because of their preponderance in "pink collar" jobs, still earn less than men.

• Women, because they work fewer years at lower-paying jobs, have less in savings and less income in retirement.

• Women continue to be underrepresented in business power structure. The Catalyst organization says that 15.4 percent of Fortune500 corporate officers are women; 14.8 percent of Fortune 500 board seats are held by women; and 6.7 percent of Fortune 500 top executive earners are women.

• Women, who head 40 percent of U.S. households, are more likely to live in poverty.

• Women are more than twice as likely as men to hold part-time jobs.

You can cite individual exceptions to those generalities. But in the aggregate they show that merely being in the workplace doesn't equate to empowerment or equality.

And, as The Economist noted in its cover story, the United States has been slow to create workplace policies that accommodate the realities of child- and elder-care giving that tend to fall on women.

So that's why saying, "We Did It!" may be premature.

But it's OK to recognize the gains for women. For many, the benefits of financial liberation are great.

And it should be noted that workplace gains are going hand in hand with education.

Women are more than half of the college student population. As women's education and professional work force participation grows, there may, within a generation, be a time where "We Did It!" truly deserves the exclamation point.


Diane Stafford is the workplace and careers columnist at The Kansas City Star. Readers may write to her at: Kansas City Star, 1729 Grand Blvd., Kansas City, Mo. 64108-1413, or by e-mail at dstafford@kcstar.com.


http://www.tennessean.com/article/20100124/BUSINESS01/1240335/1003/NEWS01


Not Just a "Women's Issue"

Sec. Hilda Solis

Sec. Hilda Solis

Posted: January 29, 2010 11:56 AM


One year ago today, President Obama signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which restores the law to where it was before the Supreme Court's decision in Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. by clarifying that a discriminatory compensation decision or other practice that is unlawful under title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 occurs each time compensation is paid.

In signing the bill, President Obama said, "equal pay is by no means just a women's issue -- it's a family issue... And in this economy, when so many folks are already working harder for less and struggling to get by, the last thing they can afford is losing part of each month's paychecks to simple discrimination."

One year later, the law has already been applied to court cases involving allegations of wage discrimination; however, an earnings gap still remains, as does wage discrimination, as attested to by wage discrimination complaints filed and court decisions.

Women earn only about 80 cents for every dollar that a man earns, and the gap is even greater for African American women and Latinas, who earn only 70 cents and 63 cents, respectively, for every dollar a man earns.

The wage gap has significant consequences to the economic security of women and families. Today, families are increasingly dependent on women's wages. In married couple families, wives' earnings account for 36 percent of family income, and approximately 2 million women have now become the sole breadwinner, supporting families with just over one-third of the usual family income.

Reducing or eliminating the earnings gap will require action on many fronts, including moving more women into non-traditional jobs, creating opportunities for occupational mobility, and addressing wage discrimination.

While women have made strides in increasing their numbers in male-dominated occupations, among the 20 leading occupations of employed women, women are the majority among all but first line managers/supervisors of retail sales workers; managers, all others; and cooks.

My vision of "Good Jobs for Everyone" includes, among other things, increasing workers' incomes and narrowing wage and income inequality and helping workers who are in low-wage jobs find a path into middle class jobs. Among the steps the Labor Department will be taking to deal with wage discrimination is a renewed emphasis on the identification and elimination of gender-based compensation discrimination at the worksites of Federal contractors. In addition, the Women's Bureau has been engaging in and will increase its outreach to stakeholders and its education efforts to its customers to apprise them of their employment rights in furtherance of my vision.

This entry also appears on the White House blog along with a video of the signing ceremony.

Follow Sec. Hilda Solis on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@HildaSolisDOL






twitter.com/ubcsibhttp://sistersinthebrotherhood.blogspot.com/SIB facebook fan  pagewww.myspace.com/sistersinthebrotherhood
http://sistersinthebrotherhood.org

CONNECT ME TO SIB
Subject: *
Your Name: *
E-mail Address: *
Message: *

* Required